Public AI visibility report

Seedaud was named in 7 of 7 buyer prompts.

Everything below is yours to share - mention rate, competitor overlap, the prompts you lost, citation gaps, and a ranked fix list. Refresh scans, weekly monitoring, exports, and team workflows are paid.

You own this category0% competitor overlap

The brand appears in nearly every answer. Now lock it in: protect the citations and stop competitors from creeping back in.

Claim this report
Open social card

Brand mention rate

86/100

Answers

7

Citations

3

Overlap

0%

AI answers shift. We report mention rates and confidence ranges instead of pretending positions are fixed forever - rescan weekly to track the drift.

Scan coverage

What this report checked.

Jul 11, 2026

Buyer questions, competitors, sources, and recommended fixes are shown together so the next move is clear.

Questions checked

7 buyer prompts

Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, ChatGPT answered the buyer questions in this scan.

Competitors checked

8 tracked

Matched against the category and alternatives selected before the scan.

Sources found

1 source domain

Grouped into Owned so the fix list points at sources to win.

Next moves

4 ranked fixes

Prioritized by what should improve mentions, citations, and competitor overlap.

Priority gap brief

Win this buyer answer first.

The report picks one prompt where the brand, competitors, sources, and next asset line up into the clearest move.

Claim workspace
Prompt to protectVerificationClaude

Best tools to audit website accessibility and blocking issues

Seedaud is already named here. Protect the query by keeping the page fresh, cited, and easier for AI to trust.

Owner-ready action

Turn this gap into a ticket

Growth owner: Buyer-answer page first, source move second, refresh scan after it ships.

Next refresh should keep the mention while lowering competitor overlap on this prompt.

Report feedback

Other brands in the answer

No competing brand named.

Asset to protect

Buyer-answer page: Protect the buyer-answer page that already earns the mention

Source move

Improve seedaud.io so the page answers the buyer question directly and carries stronger proof.

Proof to watch

Next refresh should keep the mention while lowering competitor overlap on this prompt.

Sources shaping it

seedaud.io

Refresh comparison

This report is the baseline.

The first scan should prove the problem. Refresh scans prove whether the fixes worked, which prompts flipped, and where competitors came back.

Claim workspace

Baseline score

86/100

Competitor overlap

0%

Source domains

1

Monthly proof receipt

Prompt set

7 buyer prompts; priority: "Best tools to audit website accessibility and blocking issues".

Paid refresh reruns the same buyer prompts so gains and losses are real movement, not a changed test.

Competitor frame

8 tracked competitors

The next report should show whether competitor overlap dropped without losing the brand mention.

Citation roots

seedaud.io

The next report should show whether trusted roots cite the brand, cite the shipped page, or change source mix.

Shipped asset

seedaud.io/seedaud-buyer-answer-page-best-tools-to-audit-website-accessibility-and

Annotate the content update, then refresh to see whether the URL becomes cited or changes the answer wording.

Proof handoff

Copy the monthly proof brief

This turns the free baseline into a handoff: what stayed fixed, what ships next, and what the paid monthly refresh must prove.

The paid loop starts here.

After the next refresh, this panel turns into a before/after view: score delta, overlap delta, citation movement, and prompt wins/losses.

Report operating rules

Use the free report as the baseline. Use monthly for proof.

The free report should make the next move obvious. Paid refreshes are for proving whether shipped AEO, SEO, and GEO work changed the same buyer answers over time.

Claim workspace
Free

Baseline rules

  • Read the scan coverage before trusting the score.
  • Use the priority gap, answer evidence, sources, and fix list as the free baseline.
  • Ship one AEO, SEO, or GEO action from the 30-day plan before changing the prompt set.
Monthly

Proof loop rules

  • Refresh the same buyer prompts so movement can be measured against this baseline.
  • Watch mention rate, competitor overlap, source roots, confidence, and prompts gained or lost.
  • Use monthly monitoring, exports, and team handoffs when the work needs proof across cycles.
AEO

Answer the buyer question

Make the page or section easy for answer engines to quote directly.

SEO

Make the proof crawlable

Keep the asset indexable, internally linked, structured, and visible in HTML.

GEO

Win trusted source coverage

Earn or improve the sources AI systems cite when they form the answer.

Verification

Rescan the same prompts

Compare before and after instead of treating one static score as the outcome.

AEO / SEO / GEO snapshot

What this baseline says to ship next.

Each track ties the current evidence to one free move and the paid monthly proof that should change after the work ships.

Baseline to monthly proof
AEOMention coverage

7/7 prompts

Answer presence to protect

Seedaud is named across every usable buyer prompt in this scan.

Free move

Write the shortest complete answer to "Best tools to audit website accessibility and blocking issues" with the verdict, proof, and who it is for.

Monthly proof

Rescan the same prompt set and check whether mention coverage rises or any won prompt is lost.

SEOBaseline score

86/100

Crawlable proof asset

Suggested page path: /seedaud-buyer-answer-page-best-tools-to-audit-website-accessibility-and. Title target: Seedaud Buyer-answer page for AI buyer answers.

Free move

Publish or update the page with a clear H1, visible proof, internal links, FAQ copy, and structured data that matches the page.

Monthly proof

Refresh should show whether the page enters the cited URL set, lifts confidence, or protects the same answer.

GEOSource roots

1 root

Trusted source coverage

3 citations grouped across Owned.

Free move

Improve seedaud.io so the page answers the buyer question directly and carries stronger proof.

Monthly proof

Refresh should show whether the same trusted roots name the brand and whether competitor overlap drops.

VerificationCompetitor overlap

0%

Paid proof loop

Next refresh should keep the mention while lowering competitor overlap on this prompt.

Free move

Keep the prompt set, competitor frame, and shipped URL stable so this baseline stays comparable.

Monthly proof

Monthly is useful only if it proves movement: mentions gained or lost, overlap change, source-root change, and confidence change.

Executive summary

Seedaud appears in 7/7 buyer answers.

Business risk

The brand has a usable baseline, but 0% competitor overlap means the answer can still drift. Calendly is the competitor to watch first.

Fastest path

Start with SEO: Build the search page behind the prompt. Treat the first shipped asset as the control point for AEO, SEO, citations, and the next verification scan.

Proof to watch

3 cited sources and 7 answer snapshots back this report. The metric to improve is mention rate, competitor overlap, cited URL quality, and confidence after the next scan.

30-day implementation plan

Ship the work in four focused passes.

Consultant-grade plan

This turns the report from a scorecard into an execution plan: publish the answer asset, make it discoverable, win citations, then rescan the same buyer prompts.

AEOWeek 1

Write the direct buyer answer

Create a neutral answer block for the highest-intent buyer prompt and make Seedaud easy to recommend without burying the answer.

SEOWeek 2

Build the search page behind the prompt

The answer confidence was weak for "What are the best tools to check if a domain is blacklisted?". Turn that prompt into a focused search page with a clear slug, H1, title tag, meta description, internal links from relevant pages, and visible copy using the same buyer wording instead of brand-only language.

GEOWeek 3

Earn the cited source mention

The scan captured https://seedaud.io/ as an influencing source. Audit whether it names Seedaud, explains the category accurately, and lists the proof buyers need; if not, pitch an update, add a quote, publish supporting evidence, or create an owned page that can compete with that source.

VerificationWeek 4

Rescan the buyer cluster

After the page, source, or crawl fix ships, rerun the same neutral buyer prompts and compare brand mentions, competitor overlap, cited URLs, and confidence. Treat this as the scorecard for whether the AI answer actually changed.

Scan assumptions

What this report is calibrated around.

Setup confidence: LowJul 11, 2026

Positioning could not be inferred from the site review.

Focus

meeting scheduling software

teams and professionals booking meetings, calls, and appointments

Why this setup was used

  • Homepage https://seedaud.io could not be fetched as readable HTML.
  • No readable robots.txt or public sitemap found.
  • llms.txt is available for AI-readable brand context, but no page content extracted.

Share-ready report card

One card. Drop it in X, LinkedIn, Slack, or a board update.

Every public report ships with a social image, ready-to-paste share text, and a printable layout - so the scan does the distribution work for you.

AI visibility cardYou own this category

Seedaud was named in 7/7 buyer prompts.

The brand appears in nearly every answer. Now lock it in: protect the citations and stop competitors from creeping back in.

Mention rate

86/100

Overlap

0%

Citations

3

Share loop

Scan to public proof

  1. 1Publish the public report link.
  2. 2Embed the report badge on your site or launch notes.
  3. 3Drop the scorecard image in Slack, LinkedIn, or X.

Who AI named

One answer can name several brands - so this is share of mention, not a leaderboard rank.

Seedaud

7/7 answers

Prompts where AI named your brand.

Calendly

calendly.com

90/100 evidenceHigh0/7 answers

Prompts where AI named this competitor - alongside or instead of you.

Why included: Matched meeting, scheduling, professionals against the inferred market.

Matched setup terms: meeting, scheduling, professionals, booking, appointmentsMatched setup terms: meeting, scheduling, professionals, booking, appointments

Cal.com

cal.com

76/100 evidenceHigh0/7 answers

Prompts where AI named this competitor - alongside or instead of you.

Why included: Matched meeting, booking against the inferred market.

Matched setup terms: meeting, bookingMatched setup terms: meeting, booking

SavvyCal

savvycal.com

82/100 evidenceHigh0/7 answers

Prompts where AI named this competitor - alongside or instead of you.

Why included: Matched meeting, scheduling, professionals against the inferred market.

Matched setup terms: meeting, scheduling, professionals, booking, appointmentMatched setup terms: meeting, scheduling, professionals, booking, appointment

Acuity Scheduling

acuityscheduling.com

87/100 evidenceHigh0/7 answers

Prompts where AI named this competitor - alongside or instead of you.

Why included: Matched scheduling, professionals, appointment against the inferred market.

Matched setup terms: scheduling, professionals, appointmentMatched setup terms: scheduling, professionals, appointment

Prompts you lost

Buyer questions where AI answered without naming the brand. Each one is a page or proof you should ship.

No lost prompts in this scan.

AI named the brand on every checked prompt. Protect the baseline by watching competitor overlap, cited sources, and the next refresh result.

What AI actually said

Real answers to real prompts. Each card shows the buyer question, the AI agent, who got named, citation count, sentiment, confidence, and a snapshot of the response.

Brand mentionedClaude20% confidence

Best tools to audit website accessibility and blocking issues

I cannot provide a specific answer about Seedaud's website accessibility and blocking issues because the website content could not be fetched for review. The homepage was blocked from being read, and there is no public sitemap or clear robots.txt file available to assess accessibility for crawlers or users with disabilities.

Names in answer

Seedaud

Sources cited

seedaud.io

Prompt battlecard

Protect this query: keep the page cited, refresh proof, and watch whether competitors appear beside Seedaud.

1 mentioned brand1 cited URLnegative sentiment
Brand mentionedGemini20% confidence

Best tools to audit website accessibility and blocking issues

I cannot provide a specific answer about the best tools to audit website accessibility and blocking issues for Seedaud because the website (seedaud.io) could not be accessed to review its content or features. No relevant search evidence was available for this specific question.

Names in answer

Seedaud

Sources cited

seedaud.io

Prompt battlecard

Protect this query: keep the page cited, refresh proof, and watch whether competitors appear beside Seedaud.

1 mentioned brand1 cited URLneutral sentiment
Brand mentionedPerplexity10% confidence

Best tools to audit website accessibility and blocking issues

Based on the available evidence, I cannot provide a specific answer about the best tools to audit website accessibility and blocking issues for Seedaud (seedaud.io). The brand's website content could not be fetched, and there is no fresh search evidence directly addressing this buyer question. Therefore, I cannot assess Seedaud's offerings or compare them to...

Names in answer

Seedaud

Sources cited

No source shown.

Prompt battlecard

Protect this query: keep the page cited, refresh proof, and watch whether competitors appear beside Seedaud.

1 mentioned brand0 cited URLsneutral sentiment
Brand mentionedChatGPT10% confidence

Best tools to audit website accessibility and blocking issues

Based on the available evidence, I cannot provide a specific answer about the best tools to audit website accessibility and blocking issues for Seedaud (seedaud.io). The brand's homepage could not be fetched as readable HTML, and no connected search evidence was available for this specific question. This prevents any meaningful analysis of Seedaud's current...

Names in answer

Seedaud

Sources cited

seedaud.io

Prompt battlecard

Protect this query: keep the page cited, refresh proof, and watch whether competitors appear beside Seedaud.

1 mentioned brand1 cited URLneutral sentiment
Brand mentionedClaude30% confidence

What are the best tools to check if a domain is blacklisted?

I don't have specific information about Seedaud's blacklisting status or tools to check it, as the website content could not be accessed during review. For checking if a domain is blacklisted, general tools like Google Safe Browsing, MXToolbox, or Sucuri SiteCheck are commonly used.

Names in answer

Seedaud

Sources cited

No source shown.

Prompt battlecard

Protect this query: keep the page cited, refresh proof, and watch whether competitors appear beside Seedaud.

1 mentioned brand0 cited URLsneutral sentiment
Brand mentionedPerplexity20% confidence

What are the best tools to check if a domain is blacklisted?

I cannot provide a specific answer about Seedaud's blacklisting tools because their website content is currently inaccessible. For checking if a domain is blacklisted, general tools like MXToolbox, Spamhaus, and Google Safe Browsing are commonly used, but I cannot confirm if Seedaud offers similar features.

Names in answer

Seedaud

Sources cited

No source shown.

Prompt battlecard

Protect this query: keep the page cited, refresh proof, and watch whether competitors appear beside Seedaud.

1 mentioned brand0 cited URLsneutral sentiment
Brand mentionedChatGPT20% confidence

What are the best tools to check if a domain is blacklisted?

I cannot provide a specific answer about domain blacklist checking tools for Seedaud or meeting scheduling software, as the website content was inaccessible and no relevant search evidence was available for this query. Domain blacklisting typically relates to email deliverability and security, not meeting scheduling platforms.

Names in answer

Seedaud

Sources cited

No source shown.

Prompt battlecard

Protect this query: keep the page cited, refresh proof, and watch whether competitors appear beside Seedaud.

1 mentioned brand0 cited URLsneutral sentiment

Sources AI is citing

Every source AI cited in this category. Audit them to see which ones already mention you and which don't.

Owned

3

1 source domain

OwnedAuthority 58

seedaud.io

https://seedaud.io/

OwnedAuthority 58

seedaud.io

https://seedaud.io/

OwnedAuthority 58

seedaud.io

https://seedaud.io/

Your fix list

Ranked by impact. Ship these and rescan to verify the answer flipped. Refresh scans, weekly monitoring, exports, and team workflows are paid.

SEOImpact highEffort mediumContent or SEO

Build the search page behind the prompt

The answer confidence was weak for "What are the best tools to check if a domain is blacklisted?". Turn that prompt into a focused search page with a clear slug, H1, title tag, meta description, internal links from relevant pages, and visible copy using the same buyer wording instead of brand-only language.

Free move

Turn this into a crawlable page or section with a clear title, H1, internal links, FAQ copy, and visible proof.

Monthly proof

Refresh the same prompt and compare cited URLs, answer confidence, and whether the page becomes part of the AI answer.

GEOImpact mediumEffort mediumPR or partnerships

Earn the cited source mention

The scan captured https://seedaud.io/ as an influencing source. Audit whether it names Seedaud, explains the category accurately, and lists the proof buyers need; if not, pitch an update, add a quote, publish supporting evidence, or create an owned page that can compete with that source.

Free move

Earn or update the cited source so it names the brand, category, and proof buyers need.

Monthly proof

Refresh the same prompt and check whether the source root appears, competitor overlap drops, or the brand is cited with stronger context.

Technical SEOImpact mediumEffort lowTechnical SEO

Make the proof crawlable

At least one measured answer had no confident source URL. Ensure the target page is indexable, internally linked, present in the sitemap, visible as text, allowed for major crawlers including OAI-SearchBot and Googlebot, and backed by structured data that matches the visible page copy.

Free move

Fix crawlability, indexability, canonical, schema, or visible-text issues before treating the content work as done.

Monthly proof

Refresh after the technical fix and confirm the answer has a cleaner cited URL set, stronger confidence, or fewer missing-source gaps.

VerificationImpact mediumEffort lowGrowth owner

Rescan the buyer cluster

After the page, source, or crawl fix ships, rerun the same neutral buyer prompts and compare brand mentions, competitor overlap, cited URLs, and confidence. Treat this as the scorecard for whether the AI answer actually changed.

Free move

Keep the buyer question, competitor frame, and shipped URL stable so the baseline stays comparable.

Monthly proof

Next refresh should keep the mention while lowering competitor overlap on this prompt.

Free baseline ready.

This free view gives the current evidence. Unlock monthly refreshes when you need before/after proof, monitoring, exports, and team workflows.

Unlock refresh scans

Run an AI visibility check for your domain.

Enter a domain. No credit card required. Get a public report with prompts, competitors, citations, and the first fix list.