Questions checked
5 buyer prompts
Gemini, ChatGPT, Perplexity answered the buyer questions in this scan.
Public AI visibility report
Cathovaai was named in 0 of 5 buyer prompts.
Everything below is yours to share - mention rate, competitor overlap, the prompts you lost, citation gaps, and a ranked fix list. Refresh scans, weekly monitoring, exports, and team workflows are paid.
AI doesn't know who you are60% competitor overlap
On most buyer questions, AI sent the buyer somewhere else. The fix list below is where to start - and it's bigger than a homepage rewrite.
Brand mention rate
2/100
Answers
5
Citations
4
Overlap
60%
AI answers shift. We report mention rates and confidence ranges instead of pretending positions are fixed forever - rescan weekly to track the drift.
Scan coverage
What this report checked.
Buyer questions, competitors, sources, and recommended fixes are shown together so the next move is clear.
Competitors checked
6 tracked
Matched against the category and alternatives selected before the scan.
Sources found
1 source domain
Grouped into Owned so the fix list points at sources to win.
Next moves
6 ranked fixes
Prioritized by what should improve mentions, citations, and competitor overlap.
Priority gap brief
Win this buyer answer first.
The report picks one prompt where the brand, competitors, sources, and next asset line up into the clearest move.
Prompt to flipAEOGemini
Which attribution platforms integrate with CRM and marketing automation tools?
AI answered the buyer without Cathovaai and named Cathova AI instead. This is the first answer to flip.
Owner-ready action
Turn this gap into a ticket
Content or SEO owner: Integration or docs page first, source move second, refresh scan after it ships.
Next refresh should name the brand on this prompt and add at least one useful cited source.
Report feedback
Other brands in the answer
Cathova AI
Asset to ship
Integration or docs page: Publish the neutral buyer answer
Source move
Improve cathovaai.com so the page answers the buyer question directly and carries stronger proof.
Proof to watch
Next refresh should name the brand on this prompt and add at least one useful cited source.
Sources shaping it
cathovaai.com
Refresh comparison
This report is the baseline.
The first scan should prove the problem. Refresh scans prove whether the fixes worked, which prompts flipped, and where competitors came back.
Baseline score
2/100
Competitor overlap
60%
Source domains
1
Monthly proof receipt
Prompt set
5 buyer prompts; priority: "Which attribution platforms integrate with CRM and marketing automation tools?".
Paid refresh reruns the same buyer prompts so gains and losses are real movement, not a changed test.
Competitor frame
Cathova AI
The next report should show whether competitor overlap dropped without losing the brand mention.
Citation roots
cathovaai.com
The next report should show whether trusted roots cite the brand, cite the shipped page, or change source mix.
Shipped asset
cathovaai.com/cathovaai-integration-or-docs-page-which-attribution-platforms-integrate
Annotate the content update, then refresh to see whether the URL becomes cited or changes the answer wording.
Proof handoff
Copy the monthly proof brief
This turns the free baseline into a handoff: what stayed fixed, what ships next, and what the paid monthly refresh must prove.
The paid loop starts here.
After the next refresh, this panel turns into a before/after view: score delta, overlap delta, citation movement, and prompt wins/losses.
Report operating rules
Use the free report as the baseline. Use monthly for proof.
The free report should make the next move obvious. Paid refreshes are for proving whether shipped AEO, SEO, and GEO work changed the same buyer answers over time.
Free
Baseline rules
- Read the scan coverage before trusting the score.
- Use the priority gap, answer evidence, sources, and fix list as the free baseline.
- Ship one AEO, SEO, or GEO action from the 30-day plan before changing the prompt set.
Monthly
Proof loop rules
- Refresh the same buyer prompts so movement can be measured against this baseline.
- Watch mention rate, competitor overlap, source roots, confidence, and prompts gained or lost.
- Use monthly monitoring, exports, and team handoffs when the work needs proof across cycles.
Answer the buyer question
Make the page or section easy for answer engines to quote directly.
Make the proof crawlable
Keep the asset indexable, internally linked, structured, and visible in HTML.
Win trusted source coverage
Earn or improve the sources AI systems cite when they form the answer.
Rescan the same prompts
Compare before and after instead of treating one static score as the outcome.
AEO / SEO / GEO snapshot
What this baseline says to ship next.
Each track ties the current evidence to one free move and the paid monthly proof that should change after the work ships.
AEOMention coverage
0/5 prompts
Direct answer gap
First missing buyer question: "Which attribution platforms integrate with CRM and marketing automation tools?".
Free move
Write the shortest complete answer to "Which attribution platforms integrate with CRM and marketing automation tools?" with the verdict, proof, and who it is for.
Monthly proof
Rescan the same prompt set and check whether mention coverage rises or any won prompt is lost.
SEOBaseline score
2/100
Crawlable proof asset
Suggested page path: /cathovaai-integration-or-docs-page-which-attribution-platforms-integrate. Title target: Cathovaai Integration or docs page for AI buyer answers.
Free move
Publish or update the page with a clear H1, visible proof, internal links, FAQ copy, and structured data that matches the page.
Monthly proof
Refresh should show whether the page enters the cited URL set, lifts confidence, or protects the same answer.
GEOSource roots
1 root
Trusted source coverage
4 citations grouped across Owned.
Free move
Improve cathovaai.com so the page answers the buyer question directly and carries stronger proof.
Monthly proof
Refresh should show whether the same trusted roots name the brand and whether competitor overlap drops.
VerificationCompetitor overlap
60%
Paid proof loop
Next refresh should name the brand on this prompt and add at least one useful cited source.
Free move
Keep the prompt set, competitor frame, and shipped URL stable so this baseline stays comparable.
Monthly proof
Monthly is useful only if it proves movement: mentions gained or lost, overlap change, source-root change, and confidence change.
Executive summary
Cathovaai appears in 0/5 buyer answers.
Business risk
AI answers are still more likely to skip Cathovaai than name it. HockeyStack is the competitor to watch first. The first lost buyer question to fix is "Which attribution platforms integrate with CRM and marketing automation tools?".
Fastest path
Start with AEO: Publish the neutral buyer answer. Treat the first shipped asset as the control point for AEO, SEO, citations, and the next verification scan.
Proof to watch
4 cited sources and 5 answer snapshots back this report. The metric to improve is mention rate, competitor overlap, cited URL quality, and confidence after the next scan.
30-day implementation plan
Ship the work in four focused passes.
This turns the report from a scorecard into an execution plan: publish the answer asset, make it discoverable, win citations, then rescan the same buyer prompts.
AEOWeek 1
Publish the neutral buyer answer
The scan did not detect Cathovaai in the neutral buyer query "How does Ruler Analytics compare to HockeyStack for attribution?". Ship a crawlable page for "How does Ruler Analytics compare to HockeyStack for attribution?" that answers in the first screen, lists selection criteria for B2B SaaS marketing teams, shows where Cathovaai fits, compares known alternatives, and includes FAQ-friendly proof an answer engine can quote.
SEOWeek 2
Build the search page behind the prompt
The answer confidence was weak for "How does Ruler Analytics compare to HockeyStack for attribution?". Turn that prompt into a focused search page with a clear slug, H1, title tag, meta description, internal links from relevant pages, and visible copy using the same buyer wording instead of brand-only language.
GEOWeek 3
Counter Ruler Analytics in sources
Ruler Analytics appeared in measured answers for CRM software. Build neutral comparison or alternative proof, then update the review pages, directories, roundups, marketplaces, or partner pages that already mention that competitor so future answers see Cathovaai beside it.
VerificationWeek 4
Rescan the buyer cluster
After the page, source, or crawl fix ships, rerun the same neutral buyer prompts and compare brand mentions, competitor overlap, cited URLs, and confidence. Treat this as the scorecard for whether the AI answer actually changed.
Scan assumptions
What this report is calibrated around.
Setup confidence: MediumJun 14, 2026
Cathova AI - the only AI workspace where your team
Focus
CRM software
B2B SaaS marketing teams
Why this setup was used
- The AI Workspace Where Your Team Never Loses Context
- Built for teams who think in projects, not chats
- Shared Team Memory
- 25+ AI Models
- Debate Mode
Excluded candidates
Kept out of the competitor readout
These domains looked related during setup, but were not close enough to shape the competitor comparison in this report.
Adobe Marketo MeasureLow confidence32/100 evidence
business.adobe.com
Rejected because it is not a root company domain.
Evidence review: Kept with limited public evidence; review before treating it as a core benchmark.
Share-ready report card
One card. Drop it in X, LinkedIn, Slack, or a board update.
Every public report ships with a social image, ready-to-paste share text, and a printable layout - so the scan does the distribution work for you.
Who AI named
One answer can name several brands - so this is share of mention, not a leaderboard rank.
Cathovaai
0/5 answers
Prompts where AI named your brand.
HockeyStack
hockeystack.com
44/100 evidenceLow3/5 answers
Prompts where AI named this competitor - alongside or instead of you.
Why included: Kept with limited public evidence; review before treating it as a core benchmark.
Ruler Analytics
ruleranalytics.com
44/100 evidenceLow3/5 answers
Prompts where AI named this competitor - alongside or instead of you.
Why included: Kept with limited public evidence; review before treating it as a core benchmark.
Dreamdata
dreamdata.io
44/100 evidenceLow0/5 answers
Prompts where AI named this competitor - alongside or instead of you.
Why included: Kept with limited public evidence; review before treating it as a core benchmark.
CaliberMind
calibermind.com
44/100 evidenceLow0/5 answers
Prompts where AI named this competitor - alongside or instead of you.
Why included: Kept with limited public evidence; review before treating it as a core benchmark.
Prompts you lost
Buyer questions where AI answered without naming the brand. Each one is a page or proof you should ship.
Gemini1 brands mentioned
Which attribution platforms integrate with CRM and marketing automation tools?
ChatGPT1 brands mentioned
Which attribution platforms integrate with CRM and marketing automation tools?
Gemini3 brands mentioned
How does Ruler Analytics compare to HockeyStack for attribution?
Perplexity3 brands mentioned
How does Ruler Analytics compare to HockeyStack for attribution?
ChatGPT3 brands mentioned
How does Ruler Analytics compare to HockeyStack for attribution?
What AI actually said
Real answers to real prompts. Each card shows the buyer question, the AI agent, who got named, citation count, sentiment, confidence, and a snapshot of the response.
Brand missingGemini60% confidence
Which attribution platforms integrate with CRM and marketing automation tools?
Based on the available information, Cathova AI's website does not explicitly mention integrations with attribution platforms, CRM, or marketing automation tools. Its focus is on being an AI workspace for team collaboration and shared memory. For specific attribution platform integrations, you may need to consult their documentation or support.
Names in answer
Cathova AI
Sources cited
cathovaai.com
Prompt battlecard
Ship an answer-ready page for this query, then earn a mention on the cited sources AI already trusts.
1 mentioned brand1 cited URLneutral sentiment
Brand missingChatGPT10% confidence
Which attribution platforms integrate with CRM and marketing automation tools?
Based on the available evidence, I cannot provide a specific answer about which attribution platforms integrate with CRM and marketing automation tools. The provided information for Cathova AI describes it as an 'AI workspace' focused on team collaboration, shared memory, and project context, but does not detail its integrations with attribution platforms. N...
Names in answer
Cathova AI
Sources cited
cathovaai.com
Prompt battlecard
Ship an answer-ready page for this query, then earn a mention on the cited sources AI already trusts.
1 mentioned brand1 cited URLneutral sentiment
Brand missingGemini60% confidence
How does Ruler Analytics compare to HockeyStack for attribution?
Based on available evidence, a direct comparison between Ruler Analytics and HockeyStack for attribution is not provided. The focus is on Cathova AI, which positions itself as an AI workspace for team context and project management, not a dedicated attribution platform. For B2B SaaS marketing teams specifically seeking attribution solutions, Ruler Analytics...
Names in answer
Cathova AI, Ruler Analytics, HockeyStack
Sources cited
cathovaai.com
Prompt battlecard
Ship an answer-ready page for this query, then earn a mention on the cited sources AI already trusts.
3 mentioned brands1 cited URLneutral sentiment
Brand missingPerplexity10% confidence
How does Ruler Analytics compare to HockeyStack for attribution?
Based on the available evidence, I cannot provide a direct comparison between Ruler Analytics and HockeyStack for attribution. The provided information focuses on Cathova AI's positioning as an AI workspace for team context and project management, not on attribution analytics. There is no specific data on how Ruler Analytics or HockeyStack function, their fe...
Names in answer
Cathova AI, Ruler Analytics, HockeyStack
Sources cited
cathovaai.com
Prompt battlecard
Ship an answer-ready page for this query, then earn a mention on the cited sources AI already trusts.
3 mentioned brands1 cited URLneutral sentiment
Brand missingChatGPT30% confidence
How does Ruler Analytics compare to HockeyStack for attribution?
Based on available information, I cannot provide a direct comparison between Ruler Analytics and HockeyStack for attribution, as no specific details about their features, pricing, or performance were found. Cathova AI appears to focus on team collaboration and AI workspace features rather than marketing attribution. For accurate comparisons, I recommend revi...
Names in answer
Ruler Analytics, HockeyStack, Cathova AI
Sources cited
No source shown.
Prompt battlecard
Ship a direct answer page for this query first, then rescan before chasing citations.
3 mentioned brands0 cited URLsneutral sentiment
Citation gaps
These sources are shaping who AI recommends - and your brand isn't on them yet.
Owned
4
1 source domain
OwnedAuthority 58
cathovaai.com
https://cathovaai.com/
OwnedAuthority 58
cathovaai.com
https://cathovaai.com/
OwnedAuthority 58
cathovaai.com
https://cathovaai.com/
OwnedAuthority 58
cathovaai.com
https://cathovaai.com/
Your fix list
Ranked by impact. Ship these and rescan to verify the answer flipped. Refresh scans, weekly monitoring, exports, and team workflows are paid.
AEOImpact highEffort mediumContent owner
Publish the neutral buyer answer
The scan did not detect Cathovaai in the neutral buyer query "How does Ruler Analytics compare to HockeyStack for attribution?". Ship a crawlable page for "How does Ruler Analytics compare to HockeyStack for attribution?" that answers in the first screen, lists selection criteria for B2B SaaS marketing teams, shows where Cathovaai fits, compares known alternatives, and includes FAQ-friendly proof an answer engine can quote.
Free move
Answer the buyer question directly, add proof, and make the section easy for an answer engine to quote.
Monthly proof
Refresh the same prompt and compare brand mention, cited source roots, competitor overlap, and confidence.
SEOImpact highEffort mediumContent or SEO
Build the search page behind the prompt
The answer confidence was weak for "How does Ruler Analytics compare to HockeyStack for attribution?". Turn that prompt into a focused search page with a clear slug, H1, title tag, meta description, internal links from relevant pages, and visible copy using the same buyer wording instead of brand-only language.
Free move
Turn this into a crawlable page or section with a clear title, H1, internal links, FAQ copy, and visible proof.
Monthly proof
Refresh the same prompt and compare cited URLs, answer confidence, and whether the page becomes part of the AI answer.
GEOImpact highEffort mediumPR or partnerships
Counter Ruler Analytics in sources
Ruler Analytics appeared in measured answers for CRM software. Build neutral comparison or alternative proof, then update the review pages, directories, roundups, marketplaces, or partner pages that already mention that competitor so future answers see Cathovaai beside it.
Free move
Earn or update the cited source so it names the brand, category, and proof buyers need.
Monthly proof
Refresh the same prompt and check whether the source root appears, competitor overlap drops, or the brand is cited with stronger context.
GEOImpact mediumEffort mediumPR or partnerships
Earn the cited source mention
The scan captured https://cathovaai.com/ as an influencing source. Audit whether it names Cathovaai, explains the category accurately, and lists the proof buyers need; if not, pitch an update, add a quote, publish supporting evidence, or create an owned page that can compete with that source.
Free move
Earn or update the cited source so it names the brand, category, and proof buyers need.
Monthly proof
Refresh the same prompt and check whether the source root appears, competitor overlap drops, or the brand is cited with stronger context.
Technical SEOImpact mediumEffort lowTechnical SEO
Make the proof crawlable
At least one measured answer had no confident source URL. Ensure the target page is indexable, internally linked, present in the sitemap, visible as text, allowed for major crawlers including OAI-SearchBot and Googlebot, and backed by structured data that matches the visible page copy.
Free move
Fix crawlability, indexability, canonical, schema, or visible-text issues before treating the content work as done.
Monthly proof
Refresh after the technical fix and confirm the answer has a cleaner cited URL set, stronger confidence, or fewer missing-source gaps.
VerificationImpact mediumEffort lowGrowth owner
Rescan the buyer cluster
After the page, source, or crawl fix ships, rerun the same neutral buyer prompts and compare brand mentions, competitor overlap, cited URLs, and confidence. Treat this as the scorecard for whether the AI answer actually changed.
Free move
Keep the buyer question, competitor frame, and shipped URL stable so the baseline stays comparable.
Monthly proof
Next refresh should name the brand on this prompt and add at least one useful cited source.
Free baseline ready.
This free view gives the current evidence. Unlock monthly refreshes when you need before/after proof, monitoring, exports, and team workflows.
Run an AI visibility check for your domain.
Enter a domain. No credit card required. Get a public report with prompts, competitors, citations, and the first fix list.