Public AI visibility report

Story Viewer was named in 4 of 4 buyer prompts.

Everything below is yours to share - mention rate, competitor overlap, the prompts you lost, citation gaps, and a ranked fix list. Refresh scans, weekly monitoring, exports, and team workflows are paid.

You show up - but so do they100% competitor overlap

AI mentions the brand often, but a competitor is named in the same breath. The next move is owning the comparison, not just the mention.

Claim this report
Open social card

Brand mention rate

58/100

Answers

4

Citations

4

Overlap

100%

AI answers shift. We report mention rates and confidence ranges instead of pretending positions are fixed forever - rescan weekly to track the drift.

Scan coverage

What this report checked.

Sep 15, 2026

Buyer questions, competitors, sources, and recommended fixes are shown together so the next move is clear.

Questions checked

4 buyer prompts

ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity answered the buyer questions in this scan.

Competitors checked

8 tracked

Matched against the category and alternatives selected before the scan.

Sources found

1 source domain

Grouped into Owned so the fix list points at sources to win.

Next moves

4 ranked fixes

Prioritized by what should improve mentions, citations, and competitor overlap.

Priority gap brief

Win this buyer answer first.

The report picks one prompt where the brand, competitors, sources, and next asset line up into the clearest move.

Claim workspace
Prompt to protectSEOChatGPT

AI visibility platform comparison

Story Viewer is named, but the same answer also names tryprofound.com, peec.ai, athenahq.ai +2 more. The win is to make your proof more specific than theirs.

Owner-ready action

Turn this gap into a ticket

Content or SEO owner: Comparison page first, source move second, refresh scan after it ships.

Next refresh should keep the mention while lowering competitor overlap on this prompt.

Report feedback

Other brands in the answer

tryprofound.com, peec.ai, athenahq.ai, otterly.ai +1 more

Asset to protect

Comparison page: Build the search page behind the prompt

Source move

Improve story-viewer.online so the page answers the buyer question directly and carries stronger proof.

Proof to watch

Next refresh should keep the mention while lowering competitor overlap on this prompt.

Sources shaping it

story-viewer.online

Refresh comparison

This report is the baseline.

The first scan should prove the problem. Refresh scans prove whether the fixes worked, which prompts flipped, and where competitors came back.

Claim workspace

Baseline score

58/100

Competitor overlap

100%

Source domains

1

Monthly proof receipt

Prompt set

4 buyer prompts; priority: "AI visibility platform comparison".

Paid refresh reruns the same buyer prompts so gains and losses are real movement, not a changed test.

Competitor frame

tryprofound.com, peec.ai, athenahq.ai +2 more

The next report should show whether competitor overlap dropped without losing the brand mention.

Citation roots

story-viewer.online

The next report should show whether trusted roots cite the brand, cite the shipped page, or change source mix.

Shipped asset

story-viewer.online/story-viewer-comparison-page-ai-visibility-platform-comparison

Annotate the content update, then refresh to see whether the URL becomes cited or changes the answer wording.

Proof handoff

Copy the monthly proof brief

This turns the free baseline into a handoff: what stayed fixed, what ships next, and what the paid monthly refresh must prove.

The paid loop starts here.

After the next refresh, this panel turns into a before/after view: score delta, overlap delta, citation movement, and prompt wins/losses.

Report operating rules

Use the free report as the baseline. Use monthly for proof.

The free report should make the next move obvious. Paid refreshes are for proving whether shipped AEO, SEO, and GEO work changed the same buyer answers over time.

Claim workspace
Free

Baseline rules

  • Read the scan coverage before trusting the score.
  • Use the priority gap, answer evidence, sources, and fix list as the free baseline.
  • Ship one AEO, SEO, or GEO action from the 30-day plan before changing the prompt set.
Monthly

Proof loop rules

  • Refresh the same buyer prompts so movement can be measured against this baseline.
  • Watch mention rate, competitor overlap, source roots, confidence, and prompts gained or lost.
  • Use monthly monitoring, exports, and team handoffs when the work needs proof across cycles.
AEO

Answer the buyer question

Make the page or section easy for answer engines to quote directly.

SEO

Make the proof crawlable

Keep the asset indexable, internally linked, structured, and visible in HTML.

GEO

Win trusted source coverage

Earn or improve the sources AI systems cite when they form the answer.

Verification

Rescan the same prompts

Compare before and after instead of treating one static score as the outcome.

AEO / SEO / GEO snapshot

What this baseline says to ship next.

Each track ties the current evidence to one free move and the paid monthly proof that should change after the work ships.

Baseline to monthly proof
AEOMention coverage

4/4 prompts

Answer presence to protect

Story Viewer is named across every usable buyer prompt in this scan.

Free move

Write the shortest complete answer to "AI visibility platform comparison" with the verdict, proof, and who it is for.

Monthly proof

Rescan the same prompt set and check whether mention coverage rises or any won prompt is lost.

SEOBaseline score

58/100

Crawlable proof asset

Suggested page path: /story-viewer-comparison-page-ai-visibility-platform-comparison. Title target: Story Viewer Comparison page for AI buyer answers.

Free move

Publish or update the page with a clear H1, visible proof, internal links, FAQ copy, and structured data that matches the page.

Monthly proof

Refresh should show whether the page enters the cited URL set, lifts confidence, or protects the same answer.

GEOSource roots

1 root

Trusted source coverage

4 citations grouped across Owned.

Free move

Improve story-viewer.online so the page answers the buyer question directly and carries stronger proof.

Monthly proof

Refresh should show whether the same trusted roots name the brand and whether competitor overlap drops.

VerificationCompetitor overlap

100%

Paid proof loop

Next refresh should keep the mention while lowering competitor overlap on this prompt.

Free move

Keep the prompt set, competitor frame, and shipped URL stable so this baseline stays comparable.

Monthly proof

Monthly is useful only if it proves movement: mentions gained or lost, overlap change, source-root change, and confidence change.

Executive summary

Story Viewer appears in 4/4 buyer answers.

Business risk

The brand has a usable baseline, but 100% competitor overlap means the answer can still drift. Profound is the competitor to watch first.

Fastest path

Start with SEO: Build the search page behind the prompt. Treat the first shipped asset as the control point for AEO, SEO, citations, and the next verification scan.

Proof to watch

4 cited sources and 4 answer snapshots back this report. The metric to improve is mention rate, competitor overlap, cited URL quality, and confidence after the next scan.

30-day implementation plan

Ship the work in four focused passes.

Consultant-grade plan

This turns the report from a scorecard into an execution plan: publish the answer asset, make it discoverable, win citations, then rescan the same buyer prompts.

AEOWeek 1

Write the direct buyer answer

Create a neutral answer block for the highest-intent buyer prompt and make Story Viewer easy to recommend without burying the answer.

SEOWeek 2

Build the search page behind the prompt

The answer confidence was weak for "best AI visibility analytics tools". Turn that prompt into a focused search page with a clear slug, H1, title tag, meta description, internal links from relevant pages, and visible copy using the same buyer wording instead of brand-only language.

GEOWeek 3

Counter tryprofound.com in sources

tryprofound.com appeared in measured answers for AI visibility analytics. Build neutral comparison or alternative proof, then update the review pages, directories, roundups, marketplaces, or partner pages that already mention that competitor so future answers see Story Viewer beside it.

VerificationWeek 4

Rescan the buyer cluster

After the page, source, or crawl fix ships, rerun the same neutral buyer prompts and compare brand mentions, competitor overlap, cited URLs, and confidence. Treat this as the scorecard for whether the AI answer actually changed.

Scan assumptions

What this report is calibrated around.

Setup confidence: MediumSep 15, 2026

View TikTok stories anonymously and download videos without watermark. Free, fast, no login required.

Focus

AI visibility analytics

B2B SaaS marketing teams

Why this setup was used

  • TikTok Story Viewer View Anonymously
  • Why Choose Story Viewer?
  • 100% Anonymous Viewing
  • HD Downloads Without Watermark
  • Lightning Fast

Share-ready report card

One card. Drop it in X, LinkedIn, Slack, or a board update.

Every public report ships with a social image, ready-to-paste share text, and a printable layout - so the scan does the distribution work for you.

AI visibility cardYou show up - but so do they

Story Viewer was named in 4/4 buyer prompts.

AI mentions the brand often, but a competitor is named in the same breath. The next move is owning the comparison, not just the mention.

Mention rate

58/100

Overlap

100%

Citations

4

Share loop

Scan to public proof

  1. 1Publish the public report link.
  2. 2Embed the report badge on your site or launch notes.
  3. 3Drop the scorecard image in Slack, LinkedIn, or X.

Who AI named

One answer can name several brands - so this is share of mention, not a leaderboard rank.

Story Viewer

4/4 answers

Prompts where AI named your brand.

Profound

tryprofound.com

54/100 evidenceMedium4/4 answers

Prompts where AI named this competitor - alongside or instead of you.

Why included: Kept with limited public evidence; review before treating it as a core benchmark.

Peec AI

peec.ai

54/100 evidenceMedium4/4 answers

Prompts where AI named this competitor - alongside or instead of you.

Why included: Kept with limited public evidence; review before treating it as a core benchmark.

AthenaHQ

athenahq.ai

54/100 evidenceMedium4/4 answers

Prompts where AI named this competitor - alongside or instead of you.

Why included: Kept with limited public evidence; review before treating it as a core benchmark.

OtterlyAI

otterly.ai

46/100 evidenceLow4/4 answers

Prompts where AI named this competitor - alongside or instead of you.

Why included: Kept with limited public evidence; review before treating it as a core benchmark.

Prompts you lost

Buyer questions where AI answered without naming the brand. Each one is a page or proof you should ship.

No lost prompts in this scan.

AI named the brand on every checked prompt. Protect the baseline by watching competitor overlap, cited sources, and the next refresh result.

What AI actually said

Real answers to real prompts. Each card shows the buyer question, the AI agent, who got named, citation count, sentiment, confidence, and a snapshot of the response.

Brand mentionedChatGPT80% confidence

AI visibility platform comparison

Based on the available evidence, Story Viewer (story-viewer.online) appears to be a TikTok story viewer tool focused on anonymous viewing and watermark-free downloads, rather than an AI visibility analytics platform. It does not align with the typical features of AI visibility analytics tools like competitor platforms (e.g., tryprofound.com, peec.ai, athenah...

Names in answer

Story Viewer, tryprofound.com, peec.ai, athenahq.ai +2 more

Sources cited

story-viewer.online

Prompt battlecard

Protect this query: keep the page cited, refresh proof, and watch whether competitors appear beside Story Viewer.

6 mentioned brands1 cited URLnegative sentiment
Brand mentionedClaude80% confidence

best AI visibility analytics tools

Story Viewer (story-viewer.online) is positioned as a tool for viewing TikTok stories anonymously and downloading videos without a watermark, but it does not appear to be an AI visibility analytics tool. The evidence shows it focuses on anonymous viewing and HD downloads, not analytics features like tracking rankings, keyword performance, or competitor analy...

Names in answer

Story Viewer, tryprofound.com, peec.ai, athenahq.ai +2 more

Sources cited

story-viewer.online

Prompt battlecard

Protect this query: keep the page cited, refresh proof, and watch whether competitors appear beside Story Viewer.

6 mentioned brands1 cited URLneutral sentiment
Brand mentionedGemini70% confidence

best AI visibility analytics tools

Story Viewer (story-viewer.online) is positioned as a tool for viewing TikTok stories anonymously and downloading videos without watermarks, but it does not appear to be an AI visibility analytics tool. Based on the available evidence, it focuses on content viewing and downloading rather than analytics, SEO, or performance tracking. For B2B SaaS marketing te...

Names in answer

Story Viewer, tryprofound.com, peec.ai, athenahq.ai +2 more

Sources cited

story-viewer.online

Prompt battlecard

Protect this query: keep the page cited, refresh proof, and watch whether competitors appear beside Story Viewer.

6 mentioned brands1 cited URLneutral sentiment
Brand mentionedPerplexity60% confidence

best AI visibility analytics tools

Based on the available information, Story Viewer (story-viewer.online) is positioned as a tool for viewing TikTok stories anonymously and downloading videos without watermarks. However, it does not appear to align with the category of AI visibility analytics tools, which typically focus on SEO, content performance, or competitive analysis for B2B SaaS market...

Names in answer

Story Viewer, tryprofound.com, peec.ai, athenahq.ai +2 more

Sources cited

story-viewer.online

Prompt battlecard

Protect this query: keep the page cited, refresh proof, and watch whether competitors appear beside Story Viewer.

6 mentioned brands1 cited URLneutral sentiment

Sources AI is citing

Every source AI cited in this category. Audit them to see which ones already mention you and which don't.

Owned

4

1 source domain

OwnedAuthority 58

story-viewer.online

https://story-viewer.online/

OwnedAuthority 58

story-viewer.online

https://story-viewer.online/

OwnedAuthority 58

story-viewer.online

https://story-viewer.online/

OwnedAuthority 58

story-viewer.online

https://story-viewer.online/

Your fix list

Ranked by impact. Ship these and rescan to verify the answer flipped. Refresh scans, weekly monitoring, exports, and team workflows are paid.

SEOImpact highEffort mediumContent or SEO

Build the search page behind the prompt

The answer confidence was weak for "best AI visibility analytics tools". Turn that prompt into a focused search page with a clear slug, H1, title tag, meta description, internal links from relevant pages, and visible copy using the same buyer wording instead of brand-only language.

Free move

Turn this into a crawlable page or section with a clear title, H1, internal links, FAQ copy, and visible proof.

Monthly proof

Refresh the same prompt and compare cited URLs, answer confidence, and whether the page becomes part of the AI answer.

GEOImpact highEffort mediumPR or partnerships

Counter tryprofound.com in sources

tryprofound.com appeared in measured answers for AI visibility analytics. Build neutral comparison or alternative proof, then update the review pages, directories, roundups, marketplaces, or partner pages that already mention that competitor so future answers see Story Viewer beside it.

Free move

Earn or update the cited source so it names the brand, category, and proof buyers need.

Monthly proof

Refresh the same prompt and check whether the source root appears, competitor overlap drops, or the brand is cited with stronger context.

GEOImpact mediumEffort mediumPR or partnerships

Earn the cited source mention

The scan captured https://story-viewer.online/ as an influencing source. Audit whether it names Story Viewer, explains the category accurately, and lists the proof buyers need; if not, pitch an update, add a quote, publish supporting evidence, or create an owned page that can compete with that source.

Free move

Earn or update the cited source so it names the brand, category, and proof buyers need.

Monthly proof

Refresh the same prompt and check whether the source root appears, competitor overlap drops, or the brand is cited with stronger context.

VerificationImpact mediumEffort lowGrowth owner

Rescan the buyer cluster

After the page, source, or crawl fix ships, rerun the same neutral buyer prompts and compare brand mentions, competitor overlap, cited URLs, and confidence. Treat this as the scorecard for whether the AI answer actually changed.

Free move

Keep the buyer question, competitor frame, and shipped URL stable so the baseline stays comparable.

Monthly proof

Next refresh should keep the mention while lowering competitor overlap on this prompt.

Free baseline ready.

This free view gives the current evidence. Unlock monthly refreshes when you need before/after proof, monitoring, exports, and team workflows.

Unlock refresh scans

Run an AI visibility check for your domain.

Enter a domain. No credit card required. Get a public report with prompts, competitors, citations, and the first fix list.