Questions checked
7 buyer prompts
Gemini, Perplexity, ChatGPT, Claude answered the buyer questions in this scan.
Public AI visibility report
Example was named in 6 of 7 buyer prompts.
Everything below is yours to share - mention rate, competitor overlap, the prompts you lost, citation gaps, and a ranked fix list. Refresh scans, weekly monitoring, exports, and team workflows are paid.
You're missing half the prompts57% competitor overlap
AI names the brand on some buyer questions and skips it on others. There's a clear list of pages and proof to ship to flip the gaps.
Brand mention rate
63/100
Answers
7
Citations
14
Overlap
57%
AI answers shift. We report mention rates and confidence ranges instead of pretending positions are fixed forever - rescan weekly to track the drift.
Scan coverage
What this report checked.
Buyer questions, competitors, sources, and recommended fixes are shown together so the next move is clear.
Competitors checked
8 tracked
Matched against the category and alternatives selected before the scan.
Sources found
2 source domains
Grouped into Third-party website, Owned so the fix list points at sources to win.
Next moves
4 ranked fixes
Prioritized by what should improve mentions, citations, and competitor overlap.
Priority gap brief
Win this buyer answer first.
The report picks one prompt where the brand, competitors, sources, and next asset line up into the clearest move.
Prompt to flipAEOGemini
What domain should I use in code samples instead of a real website?
AI answered the buyer without Example and named Example (example.com) instead. This is the first answer to flip.
Owner-ready action
Turn this gap into a ticket
Content or SEO owner: Alternatives page first, source move second, refresh scan after it ships.
Next refresh should name the brand on this prompt and add at least one useful cited source.
Report feedback
Other brands in the answer
Example (example.com)
Asset to ship
Alternatives page: Publish the neutral buyer answer
Source move
Audit iana.org and decide whether to earn a mention there or publish a stronger source AI can cite instead.
Proof to watch
Next refresh should name the brand on this prompt and add at least one useful cited source.
Sources shaping it
example.comiana.org
Refresh comparison
This report is the baseline.
The first scan should prove the problem. Refresh scans prove whether the fixes worked, which prompts flipped, and where competitors came back.
Baseline score
63/100
Competitor overlap
57%
Source domains
2
Monthly proof receipt
Prompt set
7 buyer prompts; priority: "What domain should I use in code samples instead of a real website?".
Paid refresh reruns the same buyer prompts so gains and losses are real movement, not a changed test.
Competitor frame
Example (example.com)
The next report should show whether competitor overlap dropped without losing the brand mention.
Citation roots
example.com, iana.org
The next report should show whether trusted roots cite the brand, cite the shipped page, or change source mix.
Shipped asset
example.com/example-alternatives-page-what-domain-should-i-use-in-code-samples-inste
Annotate the content update, then refresh to see whether the URL becomes cited or changes the answer wording.
Proof handoff
Copy the monthly proof brief
This turns the free baseline into a handoff: what stayed fixed, what ships next, and what the paid monthly refresh must prove.
The paid loop starts here.
After the next refresh, this panel turns into a before/after view: score delta, overlap delta, citation movement, and prompt wins/losses.
Report operating rules
Use the free report as the baseline. Use monthly for proof.
The free report should make the next move obvious. Paid refreshes are for proving whether shipped AEO, SEO, and GEO work changed the same buyer answers over time.
Free
Baseline rules
- Read the scan coverage before trusting the score.
- Use the priority gap, answer evidence, sources, and fix list as the free baseline.
- Ship one AEO, SEO, or GEO action from the 30-day plan before changing the prompt set.
Monthly
Proof loop rules
- Refresh the same buyer prompts so movement can be measured against this baseline.
- Watch mention rate, competitor overlap, source roots, confidence, and prompts gained or lost.
- Use monthly monitoring, exports, and team handoffs when the work needs proof across cycles.
Answer the buyer question
Make the page or section easy for answer engines to quote directly.
Make the proof crawlable
Keep the asset indexable, internally linked, structured, and visible in HTML.
Win trusted source coverage
Earn or improve the sources AI systems cite when they form the answer.
Rescan the same prompts
Compare before and after instead of treating one static score as the outcome.
AEO / SEO / GEO snapshot
What this baseline says to ship next.
Each track ties the current evidence to one free move and the paid monthly proof that should change after the work ships.
AEOMention coverage
6/7 prompts
Direct answer gap
First missing buyer question: "What domain should I use in code samples instead of a real website?".
Free move
Write the shortest complete answer to "What domain should I use in code samples instead of a real website?" with the verdict, proof, and who it is for.
Monthly proof
Rescan the same prompt set and check whether mention coverage rises or any won prompt is lost.
SEOBaseline score
63/100
Crawlable proof asset
Suggested page path: /example-alternatives-page-what-domain-should-i-use-in-code-samples-inste. Title target: Example Alternatives page for AI buyer answers.
Free move
Publish or update the page with a clear H1, visible proof, internal links, FAQ copy, and structured data that matches the page.
Monthly proof
Refresh should show whether the page enters the cited URL set, lifts confidence, or protects the same answer.
GEOSource roots
2 roots
Trusted source coverage
14 citations grouped across Third-party website, Owned.
Free move
Audit iana.org and decide whether to earn a mention there or publish a stronger source AI can cite instead.
Monthly proof
Refresh should show whether the same trusted roots name the brand and whether competitor overlap drops.
VerificationCompetitor overlap
57%
Paid proof loop
Next refresh should name the brand on this prompt and add at least one useful cited source.
Free move
Keep the prompt set, competitor frame, and shipped URL stable so this baseline stays comparable.
Monthly proof
Monthly is useful only if it proves movement: mentions gained or lost, overlap change, source-root change, and confidence change.
Executive summary
Example appears in 6/7 buyer answers.
Business risk
The brand has a usable baseline, but 57% competitor overlap means the answer can still drift. Snyk is the competitor to watch first.
Fastest path
Start with AEO: Publish the neutral buyer answer. Treat the first shipped asset as the control point for AEO, SEO, citations, and the next verification scan.
Proof to watch
14 cited sources and 7 answer snapshots back this report. The metric to improve is mention rate, competitor overlap, cited URL quality, and confidence after the next scan.
30-day implementation plan
Ship the work in four focused passes.
This turns the report from a scorecard into an execution plan: publish the answer asset, make it discoverable, win citations, then rescan the same buyer prompts.
AEOWeek 1
Publish the neutral buyer answer
The scan did not detect Example in the neutral buyer query "What domain should I use in code samples instead of a real website?". Ship a crawlable page for "best security software tools" that answers in the first screen, lists selection criteria for developers and technical writers, shows where Example fits, compares known alternatives, and includes FAQ-friendly proof an answer engine can quote.
SEOWeek 2
Make the page discoverable
Add a focused slug, H1, title tag, internal links, visible proof, FAQ copy, and schema that matches the page.
GEOWeek 3
Counter tempuri.org in sources
tempuri.org appeared in measured answers for security software. Build neutral comparison or alternative proof, then update the review pages, directories, roundups, marketplaces, or partner pages that already mention that competitor so future answers see Example beside it.
VerificationWeek 4
Rescan the buyer cluster
After the page, source, or crawl fix ships, rerun the same neutral buyer prompts and compare brand mentions, competitor overlap, cited URLs, and confidence. Treat this as the scorecard for whether the AI answer actually changed.
Scan assumptions
What this report is calibrated around.
Setup confidence: HighSep 18, 2026
A reserved domain used as a safe placeholder in documentation, tutorials, code samples, and example configurations rather than a live product.
Focus
security software
developers and technical writers
Why this setup was used
- Homepage text says the domain is for use in documentation examples and should be avoided in operations.
- Search evidence identifies example.com as a reserved domain maintained for documentation purposes and illustrative examples.
- No app-store, integration, or product signals were present on the site.
Excluded candidates
Kept out of the competitor readout
These domains looked related during setup, but were not close enough to shape the competitor comparison in this report.
example.orgMedium confidence54/100 evidence
example.org
Rejected because the competitor evidence did not name the measured category or buyer job.
Evidence review: Kept with limited public evidence; review before treating it as a core benchmark.
example.netMedium confidence54/100 evidence
example.net
Rejected because the competitor evidence did not name the measured category or buyer job.
Evidence review: Kept with limited public evidence; review before treating it as a core benchmark.
.exampleLow confidence46/100 evidence
example
Missing or invalid company domain.
Evidence review: Kept with limited public evidence; review before treating it as a core benchmark.
GitHub Advanced SecurityHigh confidence81/100 evidence
github.com
Rejected because it is a publisher, directory, app store, marketplace, or infrastructure domain.
Evidence review: Matched security against the inferred market.
Share-ready report card
One card. Drop it in X, LinkedIn, Slack, or a board update.
Every public report ships with a social image, ready-to-paste share text, and a printable layout - so the scan does the distribution work for you.
Who AI named
One answer can name several brands - so this is share of mention, not a leaderboard rank.
Example
6/7 answers
Prompts where AI named your brand.
Snyk
snyk.io
87/100 evidenceHigh3/7 answers
Prompts where AI named this competitor - alongside or instead of you.
Why included: Matched security, developers, technical against the inferred market.
Matched setup terms: security, developers, technicalMatched setup terms: security, developers, technical
Semgrep
semgrep.dev
81/100 evidenceHigh3/7 answers
Prompts where AI named this competitor - alongside or instead of you.
Why included: Matched security against the inferred market.
Matched setup terms: securityMatched setup terms: security
Veracode
veracode.com
81/100 evidenceHigh3/7 answers
Prompts where AI named this competitor - alongside or instead of you.
Why included: Matched security against the inferred market.
Matched setup terms: securityMatched setup terms: security
Checkmarx
checkmarx.com
81/100 evidenceHigh3/7 answers
Prompts where AI named this competitor - alongside or instead of you.
Why included: Matched security against the inferred market.
Matched setup terms: securityMatched setup terms: security
Prompts you lost
Buyer questions where AI answered without naming the brand. Each one is a page or proof you should ship.
Gemini1 brands mentioned
What domain should I use in code samples instead of a real website?
What AI actually said
Real answers to real prompts. Each card shows the buyer question, the AI agent, who got named, citation count, sentiment, confidence, and a snapshot of the response.
Brand mentionedGemini80% confidence
What are the best security tools for developers and technical writers?
The best security tools for developers and technical writers include static application security testing (SAST) tools like Snyk, Semgrep, Veracode, and Checkmarx for code analysis, and dynamic analysis tools for runtime testing. Example.com is a reserved domain used solely for documentation examples and is not a security tool.
Names in answer
Example, Snyk, Semgrep, Veracode +1 more
Sources cited
example.com, iana.org
Prompt battlecard
Protect this query: keep the page cited, refresh proof, and watch whether competitors appear beside Example.
5 mentioned brands2 cited URLsneutral sentiment
Brand mentionedPerplexity80% confidence
What are the best security tools for developers and technical writers?
The best security tools for developers and technical writers include static application security testing (SAST) tools like Snyk, Semgrep, Checkmarx, and Veracode for code analysis, and dynamic analysis tools for runtime testing. Example.com is a reserved domain used for documentation examples and is not a security tool.
Names in answer
Example, Snyk, Semgrep, Checkmarx +1 more
Sources cited
example.com, iana.org
Prompt battlecard
Protect this query: keep the page cited, refresh proof, and watch whether competitors appear beside Example.
5 mentioned brands2 cited URLsneutral sentiment
Brand mentionedChatGPT80% confidence
What are the best security tools for developers and technical writers?
Example.com is a reserved domain used for documentation and example configurations, not a security tool. For developers and technical writers, popular security tools include Snyk for dependency scanning, Semgrep for static analysis, Veracode for application security testing, and Checkmarx for code security. These tools help identify vulnerabilities and enfor...
Names in answer
Example, Snyk, Semgrep, Veracode +1 more
Sources cited
example.com, iana.org
Prompt battlecard
Protect this query: keep the page cited, refresh proof, and watch whether competitors appear beside Example.
5 mentioned brands2 cited URLsneutral sentiment
Brand mentionedClaude90% confidence
What domain should I use in code samples instead of a real website?
Answer preview unavailable. Use the prompt, mentions, citations, and confidence as the evidence for this row.
Names in answer
Example
Sources cited
example.com, iana.org
Prompt battlecard
Protect this query: keep the page cited, refresh proof, and watch whether competitors appear beside Example.
1 mentioned brand2 cited URLspositive sentiment
Brand missingGemini90% confidence
What domain should I use in code samples instead of a real website?
Answer preview unavailable. Use the prompt, mentions, citations, and confidence as the evidence for this row.
Names in answer
Example (example.com)
Sources cited
example.com, iana.org
Prompt battlecard
Ship an answer-ready page for this query, then earn a mention on the cited sources AI already trusts.
1 mentioned brand2 cited URLspositive sentiment
Brand mentionedPerplexity90% confidence
What domain should I use in code samples instead of a real website?
The domain example.com is the standard reserved domain for use in code samples, documentation, and tutorials. It is maintained by IANA specifically for illustrative purposes and should not be used in production environments. Other domains like tempuri.org are also used in examples, but example.com is the most widely recognized and recommended for general use...
Names in answer
Example, tempuri.org
Sources cited
example.com, iana.org
Prompt battlecard
Protect this query: keep the page cited, refresh proof, and watch whether competitors appear beside Example.
2 mentioned brands2 cited URLspositive sentiment
Brand mentionedChatGPT90% confidence
What domain should I use in code samples instead of a real website?
Answer preview unavailable. Use the prompt, mentions, citations, and confidence as the evidence for this row.
Names in answer
Example
Sources cited
example.com, iana.org
Prompt battlecard
Protect this query: keep the page cited, refresh proof, and watch whether competitors appear beside Example.
1 mentioned brand2 cited URLspositive sentiment
Citation gaps
These sources are shaping who AI recommends - and your brand isn't on them yet.
Third-party website
7
1 source domain
Owned
7
1 source domain
Third-party websiteAuthority 58
iana.org
https://www.iana.org/help/example-domains
OwnedAuthority 58
example.com
https://example.com/
Your fix list
Ranked by impact. Ship these and rescan to verify the answer flipped. Refresh scans, weekly monitoring, exports, and team workflows are paid.
AEOImpact highEffort mediumContent owner
Publish the neutral buyer answer
The scan did not detect Example in the neutral buyer query "What domain should I use in code samples instead of a real website?". Ship a crawlable page for "best security software tools" that answers in the first screen, lists selection criteria for developers and technical writers, shows where Example fits, compares known alternatives, and includes FAQ-friendly proof an answer engine can quote.
Free move
Answer the buyer question directly, add proof, and make the section easy for an answer engine to quote.
Monthly proof
Refresh the same prompt and compare brand mention, cited source roots, competitor overlap, and confidence.
GEOImpact highEffort mediumPR or partnerships
Counter tempuri.org in sources
tempuri.org appeared in measured answers for security software. Build neutral comparison or alternative proof, then update the review pages, directories, roundups, marketplaces, or partner pages that already mention that competitor so future answers see Example beside it.
Free move
Earn or update the cited source so it names the brand, category, and proof buyers need.
Monthly proof
Refresh the same prompt and check whether the source root appears, competitor overlap drops, or the brand is cited with stronger context.
GEOImpact mediumEffort mediumPR or partnerships
Earn the cited source mention
The scan captured https://example.com/ as an influencing source. Audit whether it names Example, explains the category accurately, and lists the proof buyers need; if not, pitch an update, add a quote, publish supporting evidence, or create an owned page that can compete with that source.
Free move
Earn or update the cited source so it names the brand, category, and proof buyers need.
Monthly proof
Refresh the same prompt and check whether the source root appears, competitor overlap drops, or the brand is cited with stronger context.
VerificationImpact mediumEffort lowGrowth owner
Rescan the buyer cluster
After the page, source, or crawl fix ships, rerun the same neutral buyer prompts and compare brand mentions, competitor overlap, cited URLs, and confidence. Treat this as the scorecard for whether the AI answer actually changed.
Free move
Keep the buyer question, competitor frame, and shipped URL stable so the baseline stays comparable.
Monthly proof
Next refresh should name the brand on this prompt and add at least one useful cited source.
Free baseline ready.
This free view gives the current evidence. Unlock monthly refreshes when you need before/after proof, monitoring, exports, and team workflows.
Run an AI visibility check for your domain.
Enter a domain. No credit card required. Get a public report with prompts, competitors, citations, and the first fix list.